Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!






Go Back   Prison Talk > U.S. REGIONAL FORUMS > FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM > Federal General Prison Talk
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

Federal General Prison Talk This forum is for general topics & discussions relating to the U.S. Federal Prison System. If there is no other category available, please use this one.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2006, 03:28 PM
somissingmylove somissingmylove is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default 851 Notice of priors for enhancement

I am wondering if the statute 851 notice of priors to be relied upon for enhancement applies only to title 21 offenses or does it also apply to a title 18 offense where they used a 924(e) enhancement. We were going to argue that since they did not provide notice of a prior conviction before the plea agreement, that they could not relyon it after the presentence report came back, but the more I have looked at it, it seems to apply to the Title 21 offenses (drug cases) and not Title 18 (gun case). Any help would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 01-19-2006, 07:18 PM
Federal PO Federal PO is offline
Don't try, DO!
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 919
Thanks: 1
Thanked 409 Times in 192 Posts
Default

The notice of priors for enhancements does not apply, however, there is at least one case that has held that if the defendant was not advised that there was a 15 year minimum, rather than a 10-year maximum, on a title 18 gun charge, the defendant needs to be allowed the chance to withdraw their plea because they were not properly admonished as to the consequence of their plea.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2006, 07:22 PM
John B. Webster's Avatar
John B. Webster John B. Webster is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 456
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

851 is a funny and dangerous statute. Here is what it provides (in part):

(1) No person who stands convicted of an offense under this part shall be sentenced to increased punishment by reason of one or more prior convictions, unless before trial, or before entry of a plea of guilty, the United States attorney files an information with the court (and serves a copy of such information on the person or counsel for the person) stating in writing the previous convictions to be relied upon. Upon a showing by the United States attorney that facts regarding prior convictions could not with due diligence be obtained prior to trial or before entry of a plea of guilty, the court may postpone the trial or the taking of the plea of guilty for a reasonable period for the purpose of obtaining such facts. Clerical mistakes in the information may be amended at any time prior to the pronouncement of sentence.

As you can see it applies to "prior convictions.' However, you then must look at external statutes to determine which ones provide enhancements for prior convictions. You need to look at statutes sucha as the Career Criminal Offender Act and others, as well as the Guidelines. Generally, the 851 enhancement can apply to "serious violent felonies" or "serious drug offenses" both of which have specified definitions in the statute.

I know this may not be much of an answer, but sometimes apparently "simple" questions require complex answers.
__________________
Avatar: DOJ's New Civil Rights Award
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2006, 10:11 PM
somissingmylove somissingmylove is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

He was advised that there was a 15 year minimum if he qualified for the enhancement based on his priors, but the priors they used in the indictment and plea agreement are not the ones they used to enhance his sentence. Only 2 of the ones they notified him of were actually offenses that would count. After the PSR they used a Carrying a concealed firearm charge. It is starting to look like they might get away with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:51 AM
Federal PO Federal PO is offline
Don't try, DO!
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 919
Thanks: 1
Thanked 409 Times in 192 Posts
Default

Here is a good link to a "cheat sheet" produced by the federal public defender's office in Washington DC for use by defense attorneys. It says that the ACC enhancement is automatic and no notice is required beyond the PSR calculations.

http://www.dcfpd.org/sentencing/sentchrt.pdf

Their website is a good source of information in general. They know their stuff, and I know noth defense and prosecutors use the site as a resource.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-20-2006, 10:00 AM
Atalie's Avatar
Atalie Atalie is offline
WRITER/PRISON ADVOCATE
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Virginia,usa
Posts: 3,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Can this pertain to a prior state charge, if they are being convicted of a federal crime? For instance they are convicted of bank robbery then go to court and are convicted of 2nd degree murder. They will serve the federal charges first, when sentencing, does the judge take into account they have a violent conviction they will be serving time for, and therefore give them more time.
__________________

CATHERINE
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2006, 04:57 PM
somissingmylove somissingmylove is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I don't know about that one. Maybe someone will come along that does.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2006, 06:21 AM
bellisq bellisq is offline
Registered User
Donation Award 
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 5,725
Thanks: 646
Thanked 1,573 Times in 1,094 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Federal PO
Excellent reference. Other good info. on the main site: http://www.dcfpd.org/

On the sentencing section, check out "108 Mitigating Factors by M. Levine".

Much of that work was developed by Carmen Hernandez and her job was to advise all fed defenders on complex sentencing issues. She recently went into private practice and is only taking federal cases. She is still practicing in DC.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.
Copyright © 2001- 2013 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics