Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!

Go Back   Prison Talk > U.S. REGIONAL FORUMS > OREGON > Oregon Prison & Legal News, Info & Events
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Oregon Prison & Legal News, Info & Events Place news, info and events relating to the prison, criminal justice and legal system in the State of Oregon in this forum.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2010, 10:42 PM
*Precious* *Precious* is offline
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 715
Thanks: 975
Thanked 617 Times in 323 Posts
Default Pretrial Program Scrutinized

Pretrial release conditions are not supposed to be punishment.
But they feel punishing to many Lane County defendants accused of misdemeanor acts of domestic violence.
Take former Eugene resident Roger Alexander, 25, who moved to Utah in part because of his experience here. A biologist and legal immigrant from Guyana, Alexander had no criminal history when he was arrested in downtown Eugene about two years ago.
A passer-by had called 911 to report a man pushing a woman into a parked car. A responding police officer reported finding Alexander holding his girlfriend down in the car’s back seat, his forearm against her throat.
Both the girlfriend and Alexander said he was simply trying to stop her from driving while drunk. And when the case went to trial more than two months later, a jury swiftly acquitted him on all his charges: misdemeanor strangulation, harassment and resisting arrest.
For nine weeks between his arrest and acquittal, however, Alexander lived under conditions imposed by pretrial services officers under Lane County’s Victim Safety Program: No contact with the alleged victim. No entering a two-mile radius around the apartment they shared. No drinking alcohol. Observing a 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew. Wearing an electronic ankle bracelet and paying $140 a week to cover the cost of officials monitoring his whereabouts.
Such restrictions — typical for local domestic violence defendants released from jail before their trials — are excessive, many defense lawyers say.
But local court officials defend them. The restrictions have dramatically improved victim safety and defendant court appearance rates in a county unable to fund enough jail beds to keep potentially dangerous people in jail, they say.
To read more:
Karen McCowan, "Pretrial Program Scrutinized," Register-Guard (November 28, 2010), http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms...e-violence.csp.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-04-2010, 10:47 PM
Zelda50 Zelda50 is offline
Registered User
Donation Award 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 17,313
Thanks: 1,610
Thanked 8,380 Times in 4,637 Posts

It really doesn't make sense the way they keep pre-trial people in jail, who have not yet been convicted, and release sentenced inmates super early due to lack of space!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zelda50 For This Useful Post:
ConnieLynn84 (12-23-2010)
Old 12-23-2010, 02:59 AM
ConnieLynn84 ConnieLynn84 is offline
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon-USA
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts

I herd about this and i also herd that they are trying to eliminate pretrial release though aka ankle bracelet ect so they can't be sued to be reimbursed silly
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.
Copyright © 2001- 2019 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics