Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!

Go Back   Prison Talk > U.S. REGIONAL FORUMS > SOUTH CAROLINA > South Carolina News & Events
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

South Carolina News & Events Current news items and information on events related to the South Carolina prison system.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2009, 05:20 PM
Fellaswifey's Avatar
Fellaswifey Fellaswifey is offline

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 606
Thanks: 89
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
Default SC Supreme Court ruling on parole eligibility

August 25, 2009

State rules on convicted murderer Brian Major parole case

By Tim Smith
Capital Bureau
COLUMBIA — State judges and parole officials can't arrange nor interpret multiple sentences in such a way to prohibit a defendant from ever being considered for parole, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled in a 3-2 decision Monday.
The ruling came in the case of a convicted murderer, Brian Major, who had been sentenced to life in prison plus five years for possession of a weapon in the commission of a violent crime.
The justices ruled that parole officials had erroneously interpreted the law in denying him a chance at parole.
The sentencing sheet stated “consecutive,” which state parole officials interpreted to mean the weapons sentence would only be served after the life sentence, thus making Major ineligible for parole, according to the court.
He was convicted under an older statute that allows defendants to be paroled after serving 20 years.
The court referred to a previous case on the subject but went further, explaining that it wanted to deal with some unanswered questions.
“Our law is well-established that a sentencing judge does not have the authority to determine parole eligibility through sentencing,” Justice Don Beatty wrote in the majority opinion.
In a previous case involving a defendant sentenced to life plus two other prison terms, the Supreme Court upheld another judge's decision that parole officials could not require the life sentence be served first.
The judge in that case had ordered the sentences to be served consecutively but did not specify an order.
The court also has ruled that multiple life sentences can be considered one sentence for the purposes of parole.
“It follows that if a consecutive life sentence could not nullify parole eligibility on a parolable life sentence, then a five-year consecutive sentence cannot either,” Beatty wrote.
GOD is good all the time and all the time GOD is good.


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.
Copyright © 2001- 2017 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics