Keltria
12-07-2004, 03:38 PM
These facts were taken from the White Paper On Corrections in South Africa and the stats are as at August 2004. One thing I can say... at least they are honest when they point out their mistakes.
A few facts that are not mentioned in this paper are that our prisons all 231 of them in South Africa are about 163% full - that means they there are 63% more prisoners than they can accommodate. At least 45.2% of these prisoners have HIV/AIDS.
On average, 25,000 people are released from South African prisons and jails each month.
In South Africa, over 40 percent of prisoners are incarcerated for less than a year, with only two percent serving life sentences, according to a study by the Pretoria-based Institute for Security Studies
WHO ARE SOUTH AFRICA’S OFFENDERS?
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 At the end of the first decade of democracy, South Africa has one of the world’s highest ratios in terms of offender population in relation to the actual population total. Four out of every 1000 South Africans are in correctional centres. In the United Kingdom, the same total is 1.25 out of every 1000 UK citizens. In two thirds of the world’s countries, there are less than 1.5 out of every 1000 citizens in correctional centres.
7.1.2 In 1996, the National Crime Prevention Strategy team conducted an in-depth comparative study into the reason for this and to find the causes of crime in South Africa. In this study, they compared the causes of crime in South Africa, with that in other countries. The study found that there are many factors that South Africa have in common with other countries, but that there are also some factors that were unique to South Africa.
7.2 Unique factors contributing to crime in South Africa
7.2.1 All forms of crime normally increase during periods of political transition. South Africa’s had a rapid transition from apartheid to democracy. Because of this, the existing (and illegitimate) mechanisms of social control were broken down without immediately replacing them with legitimate and credible alternatives. This weakness has been worsened by the historical breakdown of other vehicles of social authority, such as schools, the family and traditional communities.
7.2.2 The 1993 Government of National Unity inherited, intact, the entire public service. Including with it, was a racially-based, disproportionate distribution of Criminal Justice resources. Personnel were insufficient and ill-equipped, systems outdated and departments were fragmented. This resulted in a system that was not able to cope with the demands created by the need to provide services to all the people of South Africa.
7.2.3 The political transition generated substantial material expectations, many of which were largely beyond what the new Government could immediately deliver. These very high, and often unrealised, expectations associated with transition have contributed to the justification of crime.
7.2.4 South Africa's violent history has left us with a "culture of violence", which contributes to the high levels of violence associated with criminal activity in South Africa. Violence in South Africa has come to be regarded as an acceptable means of resolving social, political and even domestic conflicts.
7.2.5 Historically, factors like poverty and underdevelopment were key factors in understanding increasing crime levels. Poverty alone does not directly lead to higher crime levels. However, together with a range of other social, political and cultural factors, it contributes to conditions conducive for an increase in crime and the growth of criminal syndicates and gangs.
7.2.6 Historically, also, the youth of this country has been marginalized. This, combined with the slow growth in the job market, has contributed to the creation of a large pool of young people who are considered to be "at risk".
7.2.7 The absence of appropriate role models for the youth, combined with substance abuse, gender violence and immorality amongst the youth have a significant impact on crime amongst our younger generation.
7.2.8 The problem of rising crime levels has become something of a "political football". The tendency of political parties to use the issue as a vote-catcher, has resulted in the situation where people are under the wrong impression that the solution to crime and violence is very simple and lies in tough justice and more policing.
7.2.9 The absence of services to victims of crime means that the negative impact of crime on individual, family and community is largely ignored.
7.2.10 The number, and easy accessibility, of firearms is a major contributor to violent crime. The fact that a large proportion of the citizenry is armed, serves to escalate the levels of violence associated with robbery, rape and car theft.
7.2.11 Gender inequality (inequality in terms of the power relations between men and women), in terms of popular attitudes and beliefs in favour of male domination, and the inadequate service offered by the criminal justice system to women, contributes to the high levels of violence perpetrated against women.
7.3 Changes in the composition of the South African offender population
7.3.1 The profile of the offender in South Africa is also changing, in particular since 1994. Some of the changes in the composition of our offender population, are:
a particular increase in the aggressive and sexual crimes categories;
an increase since 1994, in the number of offenders that serve long sentences; and
a significant increase in the post-1994 period in the number of children sentenced to correctional centres (with transgressions showing an increasingly violent nature).
7.3.2 Factors that were found contributing to the changing profile of the offender population, were:
the abolition of the death penalty;
the introduction of a system of minimum sentencing by courts; and
an increase in the prosecution of serious aggressive crimes.
7.3.3 The changing profile of the offender population is presenting crucial challenges for the Department. These challenges include:
an increased need for accommodation of an increasing population of maximum security and long-term offenders;
a slower turnover rate of individuals in the correctional centres, and
a need for a rapid increase in the accommodation for youth offenders in separate youth correctional centres.
7.4 People under correction are human beings
7.4.1 Profiling and offender management must begin with recognition of the offender as a human being, as a product of society, and as a potential valued member of the community. Reference to people sentenced to the care of the DCS, whether to incarceration in a correctional centre or under community correctional supervision or probation must be consistent with this approach. A variety of terms are used to refer to people in the care of the Department. These terms include inmates, prisoners, detainees, convicts, criminals, offenders, etc. This plethora of terms masks the fact that such people are indeed the primary responsibility of the Department’s correctional services.
7.4.2 In order to avoid the social branding of such people, generic reference to them as offenders should replace the plethora of terms. Where reference to the nature of a person’s sentence or status is relevant in terms of correctional management, this should be indicated by reference to:
inmates for those in residential correctional centres;
parolees for those released under the parole policy; and
probationers for those directly sentenced by the courts to community correctional supervision.
7.4.3 At the essence of rehabilitation and correction is the ability of the Department to separate the person or the offender from the offending behaviour and to enable both the offender and her family to perceive this separation.
A few facts that are not mentioned in this paper are that our prisons all 231 of them in South Africa are about 163% full - that means they there are 63% more prisoners than they can accommodate. At least 45.2% of these prisoners have HIV/AIDS.
On average, 25,000 people are released from South African prisons and jails each month.
In South Africa, over 40 percent of prisoners are incarcerated for less than a year, with only two percent serving life sentences, according to a study by the Pretoria-based Institute for Security Studies
WHO ARE SOUTH AFRICA’S OFFENDERS?
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 At the end of the first decade of democracy, South Africa has one of the world’s highest ratios in terms of offender population in relation to the actual population total. Four out of every 1000 South Africans are in correctional centres. In the United Kingdom, the same total is 1.25 out of every 1000 UK citizens. In two thirds of the world’s countries, there are less than 1.5 out of every 1000 citizens in correctional centres.
7.1.2 In 1996, the National Crime Prevention Strategy team conducted an in-depth comparative study into the reason for this and to find the causes of crime in South Africa. In this study, they compared the causes of crime in South Africa, with that in other countries. The study found that there are many factors that South Africa have in common with other countries, but that there are also some factors that were unique to South Africa.
7.2 Unique factors contributing to crime in South Africa
7.2.1 All forms of crime normally increase during periods of political transition. South Africa’s had a rapid transition from apartheid to democracy. Because of this, the existing (and illegitimate) mechanisms of social control were broken down without immediately replacing them with legitimate and credible alternatives. This weakness has been worsened by the historical breakdown of other vehicles of social authority, such as schools, the family and traditional communities.
7.2.2 The 1993 Government of National Unity inherited, intact, the entire public service. Including with it, was a racially-based, disproportionate distribution of Criminal Justice resources. Personnel were insufficient and ill-equipped, systems outdated and departments were fragmented. This resulted in a system that was not able to cope with the demands created by the need to provide services to all the people of South Africa.
7.2.3 The political transition generated substantial material expectations, many of which were largely beyond what the new Government could immediately deliver. These very high, and often unrealised, expectations associated with transition have contributed to the justification of crime.
7.2.4 South Africa's violent history has left us with a "culture of violence", which contributes to the high levels of violence associated with criminal activity in South Africa. Violence in South Africa has come to be regarded as an acceptable means of resolving social, political and even domestic conflicts.
7.2.5 Historically, factors like poverty and underdevelopment were key factors in understanding increasing crime levels. Poverty alone does not directly lead to higher crime levels. However, together with a range of other social, political and cultural factors, it contributes to conditions conducive for an increase in crime and the growth of criminal syndicates and gangs.
7.2.6 Historically, also, the youth of this country has been marginalized. This, combined with the slow growth in the job market, has contributed to the creation of a large pool of young people who are considered to be "at risk".
7.2.7 The absence of appropriate role models for the youth, combined with substance abuse, gender violence and immorality amongst the youth have a significant impact on crime amongst our younger generation.
7.2.8 The problem of rising crime levels has become something of a "political football". The tendency of political parties to use the issue as a vote-catcher, has resulted in the situation where people are under the wrong impression that the solution to crime and violence is very simple and lies in tough justice and more policing.
7.2.9 The absence of services to victims of crime means that the negative impact of crime on individual, family and community is largely ignored.
7.2.10 The number, and easy accessibility, of firearms is a major contributor to violent crime. The fact that a large proportion of the citizenry is armed, serves to escalate the levels of violence associated with robbery, rape and car theft.
7.2.11 Gender inequality (inequality in terms of the power relations between men and women), in terms of popular attitudes and beliefs in favour of male domination, and the inadequate service offered by the criminal justice system to women, contributes to the high levels of violence perpetrated against women.
7.3 Changes in the composition of the South African offender population
7.3.1 The profile of the offender in South Africa is also changing, in particular since 1994. Some of the changes in the composition of our offender population, are:
a particular increase in the aggressive and sexual crimes categories;
an increase since 1994, in the number of offenders that serve long sentences; and
a significant increase in the post-1994 period in the number of children sentenced to correctional centres (with transgressions showing an increasingly violent nature).
7.3.2 Factors that were found contributing to the changing profile of the offender population, were:
the abolition of the death penalty;
the introduction of a system of minimum sentencing by courts; and
an increase in the prosecution of serious aggressive crimes.
7.3.3 The changing profile of the offender population is presenting crucial challenges for the Department. These challenges include:
an increased need for accommodation of an increasing population of maximum security and long-term offenders;
a slower turnover rate of individuals in the correctional centres, and
a need for a rapid increase in the accommodation for youth offenders in separate youth correctional centres.
7.4 People under correction are human beings
7.4.1 Profiling and offender management must begin with recognition of the offender as a human being, as a product of society, and as a potential valued member of the community. Reference to people sentenced to the care of the DCS, whether to incarceration in a correctional centre or under community correctional supervision or probation must be consistent with this approach. A variety of terms are used to refer to people in the care of the Department. These terms include inmates, prisoners, detainees, convicts, criminals, offenders, etc. This plethora of terms masks the fact that such people are indeed the primary responsibility of the Department’s correctional services.
7.4.2 In order to avoid the social branding of such people, generic reference to them as offenders should replace the plethora of terms. Where reference to the nature of a person’s sentence or status is relevant in terms of correctional management, this should be indicated by reference to:
inmates for those in residential correctional centres;
parolees for those released under the parole policy; and
probationers for those directly sentenced by the courts to community correctional supervision.
7.4.3 At the essence of rehabilitation and correction is the ability of the Department to separate the person or the offender from the offending behaviour and to enable both the offender and her family to perceive this separation.