Nemesis
09-09-2004, 08:45 PM
How Appealing (http://www.legalaffairs.org/howappealing/index.html)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit holds that new U.S. Department of Justice policy limiting federal inmates' eligibility for placement in a community corrections center to the last ten percent of their sentence is contrary to law: This ruling is big news. As today's opinion explains:
The policy change that is the subject of this lawsuit was required by a December 13, 2002 Memorandum Opinion from the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, which declared unlawful the BOP's prior practice of placing federal prisoners in community confinement to serve all or part of their sentences. [The inmate-appellant] argues that the BOP's policy is based on an erroneous interpretation of two statutory provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. secs. 3621(b) and 3624(c). According to this interpretation, these two provisions limit the BOP's discretion to place prisoners in CCCs to the lesser of the last six months or ten percent of their terms of imprisonment. Although the change in policy has generated a flood of lawsuits in the federal district courts, no court of appeals has yet spoken on the validity of the BOP's new policy. We do so here and conclude that the new policy is contrary to the plain meaning of 18 U.S.C. sec. 3621(b).
You can access the complete opinion at this link (http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-2633-01A.pdf)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit holds that new U.S. Department of Justice policy limiting federal inmates' eligibility for placement in a community corrections center to the last ten percent of their sentence is contrary to law: This ruling is big news. As today's opinion explains:
The policy change that is the subject of this lawsuit was required by a December 13, 2002 Memorandum Opinion from the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, which declared unlawful the BOP's prior practice of placing federal prisoners in community confinement to serve all or part of their sentences. [The inmate-appellant] argues that the BOP's policy is based on an erroneous interpretation of two statutory provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. secs. 3621(b) and 3624(c). According to this interpretation, these two provisions limit the BOP's discretion to place prisoners in CCCs to the lesser of the last six months or ten percent of their terms of imprisonment. Although the change in policy has generated a flood of lawsuits in the federal district courts, no court of appeals has yet spoken on the validity of the BOP's new policy. We do so here and conclude that the new policy is contrary to the plain meaning of 18 U.S.C. sec. 3621(b).
You can access the complete opinion at this link (http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-2633-01A.pdf)