Well, it just came up on the O'reilly Factor a few minutes ago...

Apparently the Detective that was on the stand today has now admitted that he deleted parts of an interview about Lacey knowing that Scott Peterson actually had that boat.

The prosecution's has said that Lacey never saw or knew about the boat that Scott had but guess what!? The lady that owned the warehouse where the boat was kept stated/testified(?) that Lacey was there with Scott the day before she disappeared and used her restroom. Further, she said that Lacey had to shimmy between the boat and the wall to get to the restroom... This all goes down to how her hair could have possibly gotten there. Looks like the hair evidence is out the window and the prosecution is not looking good.

This is real BS... Sounds to me like the police knew she had been around that boat but were covering it up... So much for a fair playing field.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,123681,00.html

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — In a blow to prosecutors, a police investigator conceded Thursday that he deliberately failed to mention a witness who contradicts crucial elements of the capital murder case against Scott Peterson (search (http://clickit.go2net.com/search?cid=307797&site=srch&area=is.clicktracking&shape=link&cp=info.foxnws&clickurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.foxnews.com%2Finfo.fo xnws%2Fredirs_all.htm%3Fpgtarg%3Dwbsdogpile&ext_qcat=web&ext_qkw=Scott%20Peterson)).
Detective Allen Brocchini (search (http://clickit.go2net.com/search?cid=307797&site=srch&area=is.clicktracking&shape=link&cp=info.foxnws&clickurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.foxnews.com%2Finfo.fo xnws%2Fredirs_all.htm%3Fpgtarg%3Dwbsdogpile&ext_qcat=web&ext_qkw=Allen%20Brocchini)) admitted that he excluded from his reports any reference to a woman who recalled seeing Laci Peterson at the warehouse where her husband stored his small boat.

PLEASE keep the information coming about the Peterson trial, I am in Indiana and they are not covering it much at all if anything for days ... I search online when I can but lately with work schedules and teenagers seems I am not getting on here as much as I would like to in order to follow a few things.

I appreciate anything you post on this trial.

Thank you,
Terri

Wow, I haven't watched Fox yet tonight and had no idea of this. I'm guessing Garagos isn't quite so upset today about losing his juror. This is looking like OJ's trial all over again.

Freckles

Hmm... I think they are desperate to believe it was Scott and that they "have" the right guy and that is causing them to mess up by hiding information. Now this plants a seed of doubt as to his guilt... I still believe it was him but can you convict on belief...

He did it and everyone knows it...when she became missing I was 7 months pregnant with Weston adn it made me sick...i hope they find him guilty though b/c you know he did it i feel sorry for him though b.c how sick he really is ya know

steves girl i can post a link for you so that you can read the daily court information. im in cali and i can give you links to the paper here.

http://www.sfgate.com/

well all "know" o.j. "did it", too and look where he is...living close to me, eek! :mad: brochinni is said to be the "fuhrman" of the peterson trial.

Ya know, I'm saddend by the position that we are ALL in that anyone would already jump to conclusions on his guilt. It's a sad day when the real fact that "innocent til proven guilty" is only a myth.

Thank you Fed-X for posting this. I wondered what 1 piece of hair in a boat had anything to do with it anyway. She was his wife ya know?? He could have carried the hair to the darn boat off a piece of clothing.

Stacy

I've honestly felt since the beginning that he didn't do it... But, I agree with Stac... I don't know. I wasn't there...

It's pretty sick that the detective deleted part of the tape as it showed that the prosecutor's take on this was crap...

My heart goes out to both families and all their friends... It seems that I remember that his parents are members of ACLU and have been for years...

Deb

Deb

[QUOTE=StacysWar030]Ya know, I'm saddend by the position that we are ALL in that anyone would already jump to conclusions on his guilt. It's a sad day when the real fact that "innocent til proven guilty" is only a myth.[QUOTE]

Thank you Stacy. I couldn't have said it better myself. It is way to early to be convinced of guilt one way or the other. It is a sad day, and even more sad is that it has been this way for some time now.