law370
11-23-2002, 03:25 PM
It appears that the National Judicial Review is now dealing with two (2) commies waving a red flag. 1st of all one cares about Natural God given Rights that are inherited, not privileges and citizens of the “United States” (Washington, D.C.) that was established by men who are questionably moral and socially bankrupt in the Congress. 2nd: When doing your homework on the “so-called 14th Amendment,” one will find that the said amendment (along with others) was not Lawfully passed by the ¾ of the states in Union. Stick to what lawyers do best…supporting tyranny, the courts, and screwing We the People.
National Judicial Review
-----Original Message-----
From: Attorney Douglas Palaschak
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:56 AM
To: lawyerdude
Subject: 14th amendment is powerful good medicine!
Amyself is right! The 14th amendment is the key to civil rights - and it CANNOT be take away at the drop of a hat. Law107 is a tad mistaken. Congress cannot change an amendment without ratification of the states - and that is a tedious process.
Also, the distinction between rights and privileges gets us nowhere. The Supreme Court is later years says that the distinction is useless.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--- In lawyerdude..., National Judicial Review <law107@o...> wrote:
> Hello Amy,
> In regards to the so-called 14th Amendment
on "Civil Rights," it is only theory, reality proves differently.
First; Rights are inherited, privileges are man-made. These said "civil rights" are the doing of the Congress, therefore can and will be revoke at the drop of a hat. Have reservations? Speak to anyone that has gone to federal prison for a "white collar" crime, after completion of their sentence and supervised release the U.S. Probation Officer will forward the ex-inmate restoration paper for his/her civil rights to be filed. I can go into great details on this subject and the adopted 14th Amendment but I feel the point was made here in this brief
paragraph.
Thank you.
National Judicial Review
-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Self
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:40 AM
To: lawyerdude
Subject: Re: Pro-per litigants. Sure you can use federal citations.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution guaranties your civil rights. One state cannot have a law that gives you less civil rights that any other state. Civil Rights not equity, or property rights etc.
Civil Rights are part of the Void Judgement, as it pertains to Due Process under your Federal Civil Rights, which must be equal in all the states.
Amy
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:32:52 -0000 "paralegal333"
crlnmry@c...writes: Question under the Supremcy Clause are states bound to take notice of Federal Supreme Court cases and the US Constitution? Ultimatly after you have exhausted your state remedies and go to US District court challenging the lack of due process etc. utlizing the Constitution, Supremecy Clause and Supreme Court cases is it logical to assume one should prevail and the state court decision would be overturned or remanded for re trial?
Thanks
National Judicial Review
-----Original Message-----
From: Attorney Douglas Palaschak
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:56 AM
To: lawyerdude
Subject: 14th amendment is powerful good medicine!
Amyself is right! The 14th amendment is the key to civil rights - and it CANNOT be take away at the drop of a hat. Law107 is a tad mistaken. Congress cannot change an amendment without ratification of the states - and that is a tedious process.
Also, the distinction between rights and privileges gets us nowhere. The Supreme Court is later years says that the distinction is useless.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--- In lawyerdude..., National Judicial Review <law107@o...> wrote:
> Hello Amy,
> In regards to the so-called 14th Amendment
on "Civil Rights," it is only theory, reality proves differently.
First; Rights are inherited, privileges are man-made. These said "civil rights" are the doing of the Congress, therefore can and will be revoke at the drop of a hat. Have reservations? Speak to anyone that has gone to federal prison for a "white collar" crime, after completion of their sentence and supervised release the U.S. Probation Officer will forward the ex-inmate restoration paper for his/her civil rights to be filed. I can go into great details on this subject and the adopted 14th Amendment but I feel the point was made here in this brief
paragraph.
Thank you.
National Judicial Review
-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Self
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:40 AM
To: lawyerdude
Subject: Re: Pro-per litigants. Sure you can use federal citations.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution guaranties your civil rights. One state cannot have a law that gives you less civil rights that any other state. Civil Rights not equity, or property rights etc.
Civil Rights are part of the Void Judgement, as it pertains to Due Process under your Federal Civil Rights, which must be equal in all the states.
Amy
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:32:52 -0000 "paralegal333"
crlnmry@c...writes: Question under the Supremcy Clause are states bound to take notice of Federal Supreme Court cases and the US Constitution? Ultimatly after you have exhausted your state remedies and go to US District court challenging the lack of due process etc. utlizing the Constitution, Supremecy Clause and Supreme Court cases is it logical to assume one should prevail and the state court decision would be overturned or remanded for re trial?
Thanks