I just learned via DOC web site that my husband's
cousin(the codefendant) has a TPM of June 2006. I was
SHOCKED to say the least since he was the one charged
with the vehicular homicide. He was sentenced to 15
and that makes him serve 3 if he gets out then. For thosw who aren't familiar with our story (www.freewebs.com/freedomfortheinnocent/) my husband was given 6 for agg. assault. SO my
question is does the PB look at all the aspects of a
case? I can not imagine him getting out before
Rodrick! Mind you we still have no TPM so I don't know
what is up. But I am praying this is encouraging but
with the DOC who knows! Anyone who knows the story
would HAVE to admit he deserves more time than Rodrick
so I would be pissed to say the east if he got out
first. Any thoughts?

I am confused why do some inmates have by parole on the web site "not applicable to this case" (or whatever it says) but they have a max out. I just assumed only lifers had no TPM but apparently others don't too. What is that?

I don't know Tammy, I always thought it was cause they didn't have one yet or weren't eligible for parole. But that's just what I thought of when I saw it, I don't know for sure.
Wow, just read on that website you posted! I don't really know what to say about all that, it's ridiculous to say the least! I wish y'all God's blessings in your life