law370
11-13-2002, 01:22 PM
To: Attorney Doug P.
Re: Poor Posted Information/Writing
Hello Mr. Doug. P.,
We are in communications with you to express our deep concerns with your Federal jurisdiction issues that you posted on the World Wide Web. We would never have expected you or any attorney to write or post such trash, for one using this material will be defeated in a shorter period of time than it took to copy/paste it. This type of material/writing on jurisdiction can be expected from one who has little knowledge of the law, especially on jurisdictional issues.
The term “Jurisdiction,” as you may know, is a “shotgun blast;” it is the same as a general objection in court. Researching this said subject was and is extremely difficult and very time consuming. The brief we completed is about 40 pages long and there is still a great deal of work that has to be incorporated into it to be affected.
You also open the floodgates when you mentioned Title 40 U.S.C. §255. In this said title there are sections that require the State Legislators, in assembly, to pass a Bill relinquishing a particular parcel of land in their State to the United States. From there the United States has to accept this described land.
I can go on and on but there are too many details to go into with e-mail. Do keep in mind that most federal courthouse in the several states in Union are not on federal land (The land was taken by eminent domain by the so-called “Due Process” system.) in any way shape or form, nor is the the land a federal enclave where the alleged federal crime has taken place. One would actually have to have knowledge of Engineering and Surveying to determine the proper location for United States territorial jurisdiction where a crime has taken place.
With the federal courts hiding behind the term “General jurisdiction,” this is only metaphysical legal flimflam and can be overcome in regards to criminal matters.
In the future if you plan on posting such a message on the World Wide Web for everyone to see, I recommend that it be professional or hire one who has legal knowledge of this said subject matter.
Thank you for your valuable time on the above subject matter, and I hope you can take constructive criticism.
Sincerely,
David T. Connolly
National Judicial Review
Re: Poor Posted Information/Writing
Hello Mr. Doug. P.,
We are in communications with you to express our deep concerns with your Federal jurisdiction issues that you posted on the World Wide Web. We would never have expected you or any attorney to write or post such trash, for one using this material will be defeated in a shorter period of time than it took to copy/paste it. This type of material/writing on jurisdiction can be expected from one who has little knowledge of the law, especially on jurisdictional issues.
The term “Jurisdiction,” as you may know, is a “shotgun blast;” it is the same as a general objection in court. Researching this said subject was and is extremely difficult and very time consuming. The brief we completed is about 40 pages long and there is still a great deal of work that has to be incorporated into it to be affected.
You also open the floodgates when you mentioned Title 40 U.S.C. §255. In this said title there are sections that require the State Legislators, in assembly, to pass a Bill relinquishing a particular parcel of land in their State to the United States. From there the United States has to accept this described land.
I can go on and on but there are too many details to go into with e-mail. Do keep in mind that most federal courthouse in the several states in Union are not on federal land (The land was taken by eminent domain by the so-called “Due Process” system.) in any way shape or form, nor is the the land a federal enclave where the alleged federal crime has taken place. One would actually have to have knowledge of Engineering and Surveying to determine the proper location for United States territorial jurisdiction where a crime has taken place.
With the federal courts hiding behind the term “General jurisdiction,” this is only metaphysical legal flimflam and can be overcome in regards to criminal matters.
In the future if you plan on posting such a message on the World Wide Web for everyone to see, I recommend that it be professional or hire one who has legal knowledge of this said subject matter.
Thank you for your valuable time on the above subject matter, and I hope you can take constructive criticism.
Sincerely,
David T. Connolly
National Judicial Review