law370
10-22-2002, 10:34 AM
C O U R T R U L E S
WE DO IT OUR WAY
Ever wonder why there is no or little remedy in court? Read and weep.
The judicial council makes Court rules.
The judicial council cannot constitutionally legislate! And they cannot decide a case! They derive their authority from the state constitution usually, but they are a bastard child of that instrument of oppression called "Administrative law". All administrative law is unconstitutional, hyperbolically speaking. It is a violation of separation of powers - even if the state constitution seems to permit it (which it does not). The judicial council is an instrument of oppression. If they limited themselves to deciding such things, as whether court would be open on Lincoln's birthday, then their words might be on more solid ground. The judicial council also determines which book company gets the monopoly to publish the books and make the "official" forms and the winner is usually the corrupt and political over-active West Publishing who bribes judges by paying for their week long vacations at "conferences" Okay, so now the judicial council overreaches and curtails your ancient rights, and then West publishes their drivel as though it were actually valid - - and you believe, and that ends if for you! Most people would not think of challenging a "rule of court" but rules of court are mere regulations - the weakest of rules. They have no authority because they aren't made by the legislature generally. The true rules of court are distilled from centuries of cases dating back to medieval days when my white northern European ancestors first begin utilizing the printing press to publish decisions which could be disseminated throughout the land.
email address removed by moderator per PTO Policy and Rules
WE DO IT OUR WAY
Ever wonder why there is no or little remedy in court? Read and weep.
The judicial council makes Court rules.
The judicial council cannot constitutionally legislate! And they cannot decide a case! They derive their authority from the state constitution usually, but they are a bastard child of that instrument of oppression called "Administrative law". All administrative law is unconstitutional, hyperbolically speaking. It is a violation of separation of powers - even if the state constitution seems to permit it (which it does not). The judicial council is an instrument of oppression. If they limited themselves to deciding such things, as whether court would be open on Lincoln's birthday, then their words might be on more solid ground. The judicial council also determines which book company gets the monopoly to publish the books and make the "official" forms and the winner is usually the corrupt and political over-active West Publishing who bribes judges by paying for their week long vacations at "conferences" Okay, so now the judicial council overreaches and curtails your ancient rights, and then West publishes their drivel as though it were actually valid - - and you believe, and that ends if for you! Most people would not think of challenging a "rule of court" but rules of court are mere regulations - the weakest of rules. They have no authority because they aren't made by the legislature generally. The true rules of court are distilled from centuries of cases dating back to medieval days when my white northern European ancestors first begin utilizing the printing press to publish decisions which could be disseminated throughout the land.
email address removed by moderator per PTO Policy and Rules