softheart
02-20-2004, 12:01 PM
I thought this was a very interesting paper and thought I would share. It is to bad when we do get good CO's that they leave.
softie
"Who Really Has 'Game'?"
by Tracie Roe, former corrections officer
For the last four months I was an employee with the Bureau of
Prisons. I was at a High/Max prison in South Carolina. I worked in a
housing unit with over 200 male inmates. The key word is 'was.' Over
those four months I was told that an "inmate is just an
inmate;" "they're crooks;" "they've all got game, be careful it's
their goal to con and manipulate you." What did I find? The inmates
were the only predictable people. The people on staff were the shock
to my system. People asked me how I could work at a male prison;
well, it wasn't the inmates who made it hostile.
I was never asked to do anything illegal. The most that prisoners
asked for was a phone call, stamps from the unit team, gum, or
directions for their family members planning a visit. I spent a great
deal of time talking to these people, reading their mail or listening
to how their friends and family dropped off little by little over the
years. There are many lonely, desperate men and women in our nation's
prisons, all of them keeping hope for some miracle from the courts.
In my four months with the Bureau of Prisons I never met one person
who said they were innocent of the charges *- this was a shock to me.
I expected to meet hundreds of men crying 'innocent.'
The other shock was the percentage of men incarcerated for drug
offenses. One in particular, a unit orderly who worked with me, has
spent the last 11 years locked up for Conspiracy to Distribute and to
Possess with Intent to Distribute Cocaine, Employing Persons Under
Eighteen Years of Age to Distribute Controlled Substances, Using a
Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Offense, and Using a Communication
Facility to Commit a Drug Felony. He has Life plus 60 months with no
chance of parole. I read his PSI. He was never caught with anything.
He 'employed' kids who were right around his age; he was arrested one
month after his 18th birthday. He did have a gun; he was never caught
with drugs, and he used a cell phone (the communication facility).
His REAL crime was that he didn't cooperate with the government. His
punishment for that was LIFE. This man obviously had problems as a
child and lived in a rough environment, but he will never have the
opportunity at a second chance. Sure, he has court appeals going, but
so do most inmates.
The system tried to train me to be inhumane and robotic in my
dealings with the men. How did I do? I failed. I had feelings for
these human beings. I empathized with their plight. My thought
process was "wrong." My belief is that these people were put here as
punishment, not to be punished. On a daily basis I saw prisoners
frustrated by the lack of attention to their needs. Simple requests
went ignored, requests for staff to do their jobs, i.e., process
visitor requests, phone lists, obtaining addresses to the courts,
assisting with inmate programming, providing counseling and release
preparation and more. The best non-response I heard was "come back
during open house." Guess what? Open house rarely happened. On the
rare occasion it did occur, there were so many people waiting to get
in, that few were seen.
I saw correctional officers intentionally damage inmate property.
There were occasions where I observed officers pack property for
inmates sent to the Special Housing Unit. The officers intentionally
placed bottles of lotion or shampoo in the bag with the top off.
There were times when soap powder was put in the bag upside-down. I
observed one officer cut a lock on a locker with bolt cutters that I
checked out of the control center. What was his reason for cutting
the lock? It was too difficult for him to open with his key. He had
gotten the locker open; he just needed to punish the inmate for
having a difficult lock. He then proceeded to cut another lock that
was inside the locker for good measure.
What did I do during all this? I verbally protested, then shut my
mouth. Why? I was a probationary employee who already had a
reputation for being an "inmate lover." What is an inmate lover? An
inmate lover is anyone who defends the rights of a prisoner, anyone
who talks to them with some modicum of respect, anyone who listens to
them.
These people are locked up with no real recourse. I saw legitimate
administrative remedies (their recourse for injustices) being shot
down. Although these remedies are addressed to the warden or to a
regional office, they are sent to the department under complaint for
response. How often do you think those departments find fault with
their own work or actions? The responses are then sent back to the
warden for his signature and blessing.
Why am I bothering to put all this in writing? Because, although I
feel sentencing reform is important and worth fighting for, we must
also push for the government to monitor the actions of their own. The
Bureau of Prisons has policies in place. Such written statements are
impressive with their talk of rehabilitation, education, counseling
and security. However, it is only talk, words with little substance.
softie
"Who Really Has 'Game'?"
by Tracie Roe, former corrections officer
For the last four months I was an employee with the Bureau of
Prisons. I was at a High/Max prison in South Carolina. I worked in a
housing unit with over 200 male inmates. The key word is 'was.' Over
those four months I was told that an "inmate is just an
inmate;" "they're crooks;" "they've all got game, be careful it's
their goal to con and manipulate you." What did I find? The inmates
were the only predictable people. The people on staff were the shock
to my system. People asked me how I could work at a male prison;
well, it wasn't the inmates who made it hostile.
I was never asked to do anything illegal. The most that prisoners
asked for was a phone call, stamps from the unit team, gum, or
directions for their family members planning a visit. I spent a great
deal of time talking to these people, reading their mail or listening
to how their friends and family dropped off little by little over the
years. There are many lonely, desperate men and women in our nation's
prisons, all of them keeping hope for some miracle from the courts.
In my four months with the Bureau of Prisons I never met one person
who said they were innocent of the charges *- this was a shock to me.
I expected to meet hundreds of men crying 'innocent.'
The other shock was the percentage of men incarcerated for drug
offenses. One in particular, a unit orderly who worked with me, has
spent the last 11 years locked up for Conspiracy to Distribute and to
Possess with Intent to Distribute Cocaine, Employing Persons Under
Eighteen Years of Age to Distribute Controlled Substances, Using a
Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Offense, and Using a Communication
Facility to Commit a Drug Felony. He has Life plus 60 months with no
chance of parole. I read his PSI. He was never caught with anything.
He 'employed' kids who were right around his age; he was arrested one
month after his 18th birthday. He did have a gun; he was never caught
with drugs, and he used a cell phone (the communication facility).
His REAL crime was that he didn't cooperate with the government. His
punishment for that was LIFE. This man obviously had problems as a
child and lived in a rough environment, but he will never have the
opportunity at a second chance. Sure, he has court appeals going, but
so do most inmates.
The system tried to train me to be inhumane and robotic in my
dealings with the men. How did I do? I failed. I had feelings for
these human beings. I empathized with their plight. My thought
process was "wrong." My belief is that these people were put here as
punishment, not to be punished. On a daily basis I saw prisoners
frustrated by the lack of attention to their needs. Simple requests
went ignored, requests for staff to do their jobs, i.e., process
visitor requests, phone lists, obtaining addresses to the courts,
assisting with inmate programming, providing counseling and release
preparation and more. The best non-response I heard was "come back
during open house." Guess what? Open house rarely happened. On the
rare occasion it did occur, there were so many people waiting to get
in, that few were seen.
I saw correctional officers intentionally damage inmate property.
There were occasions where I observed officers pack property for
inmates sent to the Special Housing Unit. The officers intentionally
placed bottles of lotion or shampoo in the bag with the top off.
There were times when soap powder was put in the bag upside-down. I
observed one officer cut a lock on a locker with bolt cutters that I
checked out of the control center. What was his reason for cutting
the lock? It was too difficult for him to open with his key. He had
gotten the locker open; he just needed to punish the inmate for
having a difficult lock. He then proceeded to cut another lock that
was inside the locker for good measure.
What did I do during all this? I verbally protested, then shut my
mouth. Why? I was a probationary employee who already had a
reputation for being an "inmate lover." What is an inmate lover? An
inmate lover is anyone who defends the rights of a prisoner, anyone
who talks to them with some modicum of respect, anyone who listens to
them.
These people are locked up with no real recourse. I saw legitimate
administrative remedies (their recourse for injustices) being shot
down. Although these remedies are addressed to the warden or to a
regional office, they are sent to the department under complaint for
response. How often do you think those departments find fault with
their own work or actions? The responses are then sent back to the
warden for his signature and blessing.
Why am I bothering to put all this in writing? Because, although I
feel sentencing reform is important and worth fighting for, we must
also push for the government to monitor the actions of their own. The
Bureau of Prisons has policies in place. Such written statements are
impressive with their talk of rehabilitation, education, counseling
and security. However, it is only talk, words with little substance.