View Full Version : Bush Overruled on Enemy Combatant Case


FriscoLady
12-18-2003, 06:54 PM
By LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer

"NEW YORK - President Bush does not have power to detain American citizen Jose Padilla, the former gang member seized on U.S. soil, as an enemy combatant, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.


The decision could force the government to try Padilla, held in a so-called "dirty bomb" plot, in civilian courts. In a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) said Padilla's detention was not authorized by Congress and that Bush could not designate him as an enemy combatant without the authorization.


Padilla is accused of plotting to detonate a "dirty bomb," which uses conventional explosives to disperse radioactive materials. The former Chicago gang member was arrested in May 2002 and within days was moved to a naval brig in Charleston, S.C.


The court directed Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to release Padilla from military custody within 30 days, but said the government was free to transfer him to civilian authorities who can bring criminal charges.


If appropriate, Padilla can also be held as a material witness in connection with grand jury proceedings, the court said.


"As this court sits only a short distance from where the World Trade Center stood, we are as keenly aware as anyone of the threat al-Qaida poses to our country and of the responsibilities the president and law enforcement officials bear for protecting the nation," the court said.


"But presidential authority does not exist in a vacuum, and this case involves not whether those responsibilities should be aggressively pursued, but whether the president is obligated, in the circumstances presented here, to share them with Congress," it added.


Padilla is accused of plotting to detonate a "dirty bomb," which uses conventional explosives to disperse radioactive materials. The government said he had proposed the bomb plot to Abu Zubaydah, then al-Qaida's top terrorism coordinator.


He was arrested in May 2002 at Chicago's O'Hare airport as he returned from Pakistan. Within days, he was moved to a naval brig in Charleston, S.C.


Only two other people have been designated enemy combatants since the 2001 terrorist attacks: Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri, a citizen of Qatar who has been accused of being an al-Qaida sleeper agent, and Esam Hamdi, a Louisiana native captured during the fighting in Afghanistan (news - web sites).


In its ruling, the court said it was not addressing the detention of any U.S. citizens seized within a zone of combat in Afghanistan. "

DeNada
12-28-2003, 09:33 AM
I read this posting and then went to the court's opinion and find they are relying on 18 USCA 4001(a), a statute that prohibits the imprisonment or detention of citizens unless pursuant to an Act of Congress. The appellate court further argued that the Declaration of National Emergency, Military Order and accompanying congressional Resolution are insufficient to grant the Executive the power to detain citizens.

Just based on previous research of the caselaw and legislative histories of various Acts, Resolutions and Agreements, I disagree with the court's ruling. I haven't had a chance to research this particular statute's legislative history and it looks to me like the court is relying on its plain language.

I'll get back to you on this one!

Have a safe and happy holiday season.

-- Lisa