qwerty
11-21-2007, 05:32 PM
Editorial: Young lifers deserve at least a chance at parole
Executing juveniles is unconstitutional; shouldn't life without parole be as well?
Published 12:00 am PST Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section, Page B6
In its landmark 2005 opinion Roper vs. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on criminals for offenses committed when they were younger than 18. Doing so, the court ruled, violated the Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.
"Their own vulnerability and comparative lack of control over their immediate environments," the court majority reasoned in Roper, "mean juveniles have a greater claim than adults to be forgiven for failing to escape negative influences in their whole environment."
Read the full article:
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/507360.html
Executing juveniles is unconstitutional; shouldn't life without parole be as well?
Published 12:00 am PST Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section, Page B6
In its landmark 2005 opinion Roper vs. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on criminals for offenses committed when they were younger than 18. Doing so, the court ruled, violated the Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.
"Their own vulnerability and comparative lack of control over their immediate environments," the court majority reasoned in Roper, "mean juveniles have a greater claim than adults to be forgiven for failing to escape negative influences in their whole environment."
Read the full article:
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/507360.html