John Kimbrough
03-04-2007, 06:35 PM
The Monk, The Prisoner, The Buddha
During this writers two recent thirty - day stays of volunteer work in Cambodia, he has had the interesting opportunity to teach English to Cambodian Monks immediately followed by a trip to the local provincial prison to teach Yoga and Buddhism to groups of inmates there.
The contrast has been made more interesting as I have come to think of the prisoners as being monks more then the monks themselves.
Of course, Buddhist teachings as put forth in the Dhammapada remind us again and again that just because a man wears a yellow, orange or red robe, it does not make him a monk.
A monk is defined as someone who is making a constant, mindful and diligent effort to develop his mind through an understanding and practice of the Buddhist teachings and disciplines.
This can be done by a prisoner, a man in a robe, a housewife or househusband, a policemen, a prison guard or anyone anywhere.
In many respects, the prison environment is ideal for developing the mind if the men and women in that prison are given adequate food, medical care, shelter and rest, and a routine of behavior that brings stability.
This is unfortunately far from being the case in Cambodian prisons.
On the other hand, the Buddhist temple may not offer the environment that is necessary for a man or woman to develop his or her mind, whether they wear a robe or not, as how it is managed may not be based on Buddhist teachings or disciplines but may instead be something that caters to the cultural needs and interests of the culture and environment that it finds itself in.
Also, different temples may allow or disallow various actions, activities and behaviors on the part of the monks who stay there, which may also serve as hindrances to a monks understanding and practice of Buddhism and the progress that they make in developing their minds.
In fact, if monks are put on a pedestal, as they are in many countries, there may be problems that are allowed to develop or monks may not be held accountable for their actions or continually held to the course of Buddhist disciplines that they have taken a vow to learn, follow and practice.
What this writer has seen is that prisoners have the same mind and defiling impulses as monks do and to differentiate between the two because of culture and their perceived status is a mistake.
It is not where one stays or lives, what one wears or how one cuts their hair that leads to mind development.
It is the understanding and practice of the teachings and disciplines of Buddhism and this can be done by anyone at anytime and in anyplace.
We all can be monks and boddhisattvas through getting started with the work and practice that is involved in Buddhism and continuing onward with that work and practice.
©2007 John C. Kimbrough
During this writers two recent thirty - day stays of volunteer work in Cambodia, he has had the interesting opportunity to teach English to Cambodian Monks immediately followed by a trip to the local provincial prison to teach Yoga and Buddhism to groups of inmates there.
The contrast has been made more interesting as I have come to think of the prisoners as being monks more then the monks themselves.
Of course, Buddhist teachings as put forth in the Dhammapada remind us again and again that just because a man wears a yellow, orange or red robe, it does not make him a monk.
A monk is defined as someone who is making a constant, mindful and diligent effort to develop his mind through an understanding and practice of the Buddhist teachings and disciplines.
This can be done by a prisoner, a man in a robe, a housewife or househusband, a policemen, a prison guard or anyone anywhere.
In many respects, the prison environment is ideal for developing the mind if the men and women in that prison are given adequate food, medical care, shelter and rest, and a routine of behavior that brings stability.
This is unfortunately far from being the case in Cambodian prisons.
On the other hand, the Buddhist temple may not offer the environment that is necessary for a man or woman to develop his or her mind, whether they wear a robe or not, as how it is managed may not be based on Buddhist teachings or disciplines but may instead be something that caters to the cultural needs and interests of the culture and environment that it finds itself in.
Also, different temples may allow or disallow various actions, activities and behaviors on the part of the monks who stay there, which may also serve as hindrances to a monks understanding and practice of Buddhism and the progress that they make in developing their minds.
In fact, if monks are put on a pedestal, as they are in many countries, there may be problems that are allowed to develop or monks may not be held accountable for their actions or continually held to the course of Buddhist disciplines that they have taken a vow to learn, follow and practice.
What this writer has seen is that prisoners have the same mind and defiling impulses as monks do and to differentiate between the two because of culture and their perceived status is a mistake.
It is not where one stays or lives, what one wears or how one cuts their hair that leads to mind development.
It is the understanding and practice of the teachings and disciplines of Buddhism and this can be done by anyone at anytime and in anyplace.
We all can be monks and boddhisattvas through getting started with the work and practice that is involved in Buddhism and continuing onward with that work and practice.
©2007 John C. Kimbrough