brokeninoz
07-22-2005, 05:59 AM
http://www.kansas.com/images/logos/site/kansas/kansas/archives_title.gif (http://www.kansas.com/) http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gifPosted on Fri, Jul. 15, 2005http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gifhttp://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
Margie Phelps: moonlighting for hate
RANDY SCHOLFIELD: MARGIE PHELPS -- MOONLIGHTING FOR HATE
Margie Phelps has a fascinating dual life that I'm guessing most Kansans don't know about. But I think it's worth your consideration.
By day, Margie is a high-ranking state official at the Kansas Department of Corrections. A model public servant.
On her off-hours, Margie -- daughter of Fred -- joins other members of her father's Topeka-based "church" as they picket private funerals, wave "God hates fags" signs and bless the bombs killing our troops.
Interesting, huh?
She's not the only Phelps leading a rich public life: Her brother Tim, who also takes part in the group's anti-gay hatefests, is spokesman for the Shawnee County Jail.
Of course, the Phelpses are no strangers to controversy. In fact, they love the attention.
Ignore them, some say. I usually agree.
But something set me off when I read about their latest campaign to picket U.S. soldiers' funerals.
Thanking God for bombs
Army Staff Sgt. Christopher Piper was killed last month by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan. According to the Phelpses' twisted logic, soldiers such as Piper are being killed abroad as God's punishment of America for tolerating homosexuality.
So while the Piper family tried to mourn and weep in peace, the Phelpses jeered and shouted nearby.
"Thank God for the mortar," Margie was quoted as saying in a Boston Herald article. "Thank God for the shell that came from the gun. Thank God for the fact that it killed the fruit of America to punish it for its sins."
Subtlety is not their thing. Neither is compassion, love or most other Christian virtues. But even by their standards, this was off-the-charts wacko.
It galled me: How can a top state official moonlight as an agitator for a hate group? Or get away with praising the deaths of our soldiers? My tax dollars are paying for her salary?
Is that, um, appropriate?
I decided to call Margie.
I told her I was curious: Had her public protests ever caused any problems for her at work?
No, she said, because in her 15 years as a state employee, she had maintained a "bright line" between her professional role and her private life.
She never brings up her views at work, she told me, and refuses to discuss them on the job. She performs her work with dedication and competence.
She realizes her beliefs are wildly unpopular, but the First Amendment guarantees her right to speak out.
I heartily agree on that point.
The First Amendment means nothing if it does not protect unpopular speech.
Jack Rickerson, the state's director of human resources, acknowledged that it was an "unusual situation" but said that Phelps' off-hours activities had "violated no state policy" or code of ethics.
Her boss, Corrections Secretary Roger Werholtz, told me, "I don't agree with her views," but said he focused on her work performance: "She's a good employee."
Still, something in her compartmentalized attitude irritated me. It seems fair to question whether the boundaries are as bright as she claims.
A position of public trust
After all, she's in a position of public trust. As director of release planning for Kansas prisons, she has authority over a prison population that includes a percentage of gay inmates.
Isn't that a conflict of interest?
HIV and AIDS are serious health threats in that population. But by her own statements, she welcomes these scourges, right?
She bristled at the questions, protesting that she didn't know which prisoners were gay, and that anyway, she would never allow her private views to influence her professional duties.
But how could they not, if she really believes her own fire-and-brimstone fury against gays?
Unless, that is, she's a flaming hypocrite.
Again: Phelps has a clear First Amendment right to speak her beliefs and opinions.
I fully accept the reasons why in America she can't and shouldn't be fired for her extreme views -- but neither do Kansans have to quietly tolerate them.
The Phelpses have no problem violating the sacred boundaries of a funeral that allow a grieving family to mourn their loved one in privacy and peace.
So if my questions made Margie uncomfortable -- tough.
Maybe she got a little taste of what it feels like to have your boundaries violated.
"Everybody is entitled to go to their job and not face a hostile workplace," she lectured me.
I agree. I would just add this, and hope she agrees:
Everyone is entitled to have a dignified, peaceful funeral for their loved one and not face a group of hateful bigots.
Call it simple human decency.
The Phelpses might try to practice that sometime.
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gifPosted on Fri, Jul. 15, 2005http://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gifhttp://www.kansas.com/images/common/spacer.gif
Margie Phelps: moonlighting for hate
RANDY SCHOLFIELD: MARGIE PHELPS -- MOONLIGHTING FOR HATE
Margie Phelps has a fascinating dual life that I'm guessing most Kansans don't know about. But I think it's worth your consideration.
By day, Margie is a high-ranking state official at the Kansas Department of Corrections. A model public servant.
On her off-hours, Margie -- daughter of Fred -- joins other members of her father's Topeka-based "church" as they picket private funerals, wave "God hates fags" signs and bless the bombs killing our troops.
Interesting, huh?
She's not the only Phelps leading a rich public life: Her brother Tim, who also takes part in the group's anti-gay hatefests, is spokesman for the Shawnee County Jail.
Of course, the Phelpses are no strangers to controversy. In fact, they love the attention.
Ignore them, some say. I usually agree.
But something set me off when I read about their latest campaign to picket U.S. soldiers' funerals.
Thanking God for bombs
Army Staff Sgt. Christopher Piper was killed last month by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan. According to the Phelpses' twisted logic, soldiers such as Piper are being killed abroad as God's punishment of America for tolerating homosexuality.
So while the Piper family tried to mourn and weep in peace, the Phelpses jeered and shouted nearby.
"Thank God for the mortar," Margie was quoted as saying in a Boston Herald article. "Thank God for the shell that came from the gun. Thank God for the fact that it killed the fruit of America to punish it for its sins."
Subtlety is not their thing. Neither is compassion, love or most other Christian virtues. But even by their standards, this was off-the-charts wacko.
It galled me: How can a top state official moonlight as an agitator for a hate group? Or get away with praising the deaths of our soldiers? My tax dollars are paying for her salary?
Is that, um, appropriate?
I decided to call Margie.
I told her I was curious: Had her public protests ever caused any problems for her at work?
No, she said, because in her 15 years as a state employee, she had maintained a "bright line" between her professional role and her private life.
She never brings up her views at work, she told me, and refuses to discuss them on the job. She performs her work with dedication and competence.
She realizes her beliefs are wildly unpopular, but the First Amendment guarantees her right to speak out.
I heartily agree on that point.
The First Amendment means nothing if it does not protect unpopular speech.
Jack Rickerson, the state's director of human resources, acknowledged that it was an "unusual situation" but said that Phelps' off-hours activities had "violated no state policy" or code of ethics.
Her boss, Corrections Secretary Roger Werholtz, told me, "I don't agree with her views," but said he focused on her work performance: "She's a good employee."
Still, something in her compartmentalized attitude irritated me. It seems fair to question whether the boundaries are as bright as she claims.
A position of public trust
After all, she's in a position of public trust. As director of release planning for Kansas prisons, she has authority over a prison population that includes a percentage of gay inmates.
Isn't that a conflict of interest?
HIV and AIDS are serious health threats in that population. But by her own statements, she welcomes these scourges, right?
She bristled at the questions, protesting that she didn't know which prisoners were gay, and that anyway, she would never allow her private views to influence her professional duties.
But how could they not, if she really believes her own fire-and-brimstone fury against gays?
Unless, that is, she's a flaming hypocrite.
Again: Phelps has a clear First Amendment right to speak her beliefs and opinions.
I fully accept the reasons why in America she can't and shouldn't be fired for her extreme views -- but neither do Kansans have to quietly tolerate them.
The Phelpses have no problem violating the sacred boundaries of a funeral that allow a grieving family to mourn their loved one in privacy and peace.
So if my questions made Margie uncomfortable -- tough.
Maybe she got a little taste of what it feels like to have your boundaries violated.
"Everybody is entitled to go to their job and not face a hostile workplace," she lectured me.
I agree. I would just add this, and hope she agrees:
Everyone is entitled to have a dignified, peaceful funeral for their loved one and not face a group of hateful bigots.
Call it simple human decency.
The Phelpses might try to practice that sometime.