View Full Version : History In The Making - A Prelude To Stonewall


Retired-6
03-20-2003, 05:19 PM
Throughout all American history, there has been a perpetuated need in our culture to presuppose that the inherent value of a person is somehow measured by such things as persons' social status, economical capabilities, race, gender, creed and even their religious affiliation. Our culture seems to thrive upon "lables" to rationalize not only the existence of something, but to also categorize it for proper processing throughout life. Ultimately reaching a level of dehumanization far beyond what should have ever existed or been tolerated in a cultre that literally depends upon diversity to exist.

"The term "homosexuality" was coined by a German-Hungarian journalist, Karl Maria Kertbeny in 1868, of which was presented in a letter he wrote to the sexologist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs. This term appeared again in 1869, in an anonymous pamphlet opposing the Prussian antisodmy law. Kerby argued that the State had no right to penalize or even to control private consensual homosexual behavior, and that "homosexuals" ought not to be objects of derision and stigma." [Homophobia, by Byrne Fone, by re-print consent]

"The term "homosexuality" was given medical sanction, also in 1869, in an article by German sexual theorist Dr. Karl Westphals, in which he translated into English as "inverted sexual feeling" and thus, the reverse of which was "hetrosexuality" to-wit: was an extroverted sexual feeling. Yet, it was not until the 1960's that the term "homophobia" first surfaced and was used in 1971 by K.T. Smith in an article entitled "Homophobia: A Tentative Personality Profile". And in 1972, George Weinberg's book "Society and the healthy Homosexual" defined the term as "the dread of being in close quarters with homosexuals"." [Homophobia, by Byrne Fone by re-print consent]

Although rarely discussed in society, mainstream media and Hollywood, homosexuals were persecuted and killed during WWII just as Jews were. The homosexual was given a pink triangle to wear as the sign that they were classified as "devient" and undeserving to live. Yet, unlike the many movies made about WWII and the devistation laid out upon the Jewish nation and its people. There has never been a mainstream movie ever made that focused upon the struggles homosexual men and women fought against during this time. Thus, the pink triangle is the only tangable sign of that era and the consequences forced upon those whose only crime was to want to love and to be loved. The pink triangle has transformed into a symbol of strength in the GLBT community that represents what our community fights against. For unlike all other prejudices existing in our country today. Homophobia remains the last condoned and encouraged hatered by a society mislead into believing that such people are simply undeserving of love.

In the series titled "History In The Making - A Prelude To Stonewal". I will be discussing various cultral events taking place in our country that involve gay men and women; ultimately leading not only to the Stonewall incident., But also the manner in which we continue to face struggles and prejuices in the 21st Centry. Moreover, how these things have infested our prisons and the penal mentality that often times places gay men and women at higher risk to be raped or "punked out". For one cannot begin the understanding process at the end of the problem, before first understanding how the problems originated. It is my hope that the readers of this series will share their thoughts.

emme
03-20-2003, 05:23 PM
patch,

i think you are wonderful. thank you for this. i look forward to reading your upcoming series.

xo
em

deb
03-20-2003, 05:59 PM
I, too, look forward to reading your posts. I had no idea where the pink triangle symbol came from....Thanks a million for sharing your knowledge with us....

Deb

mrsdragoness
03-20-2003, 06:19 PM
Patch, EXCELLENT!!! I look forward to the next reading!!!

Mrs. D

Chevygal55
03-20-2003, 06:39 PM
Hey Chris! Haven't talked to ya in awhile. This was really interesting! I never knew of the pink triangle either. Nice to know about it. Hope to catch up with ya sometime~

Beck

tebkrg
03-20-2003, 06:50 PM
Christopher,

Interesting piece... Yes the Pink Triangle... A symbol that adorns us today... in a sense mocking and defying the original use of the symbol.

Take a look for the movie entitled "Bent". Not exactly mainstream movie making but is a passionate look at homosexuality in a prison environment where this type of 'love' was not permitted.

Molly
03-20-2003, 06:52 PM
I think this will be an interesting series--I always enjoy learning about history. I look forward to reading the coming posts.

Take care,
Molly

Retired-6
03-20-2003, 08:57 PM
Thanks for the vote of confidence....

Chris

Retired-6
03-21-2003, 11:52 AM
There has never been a cultrure or era that has impacted the world so much as that of ancient Greece. With its innovative and sometimes even risky flamboiance, philosophies of idealism and romance, cultrual art, liberal acceptance of individuality and a style of political class. And nearly every generation has tried to recapture these things on the notion that ancient Greece is the epitomy of freedom and love in their purest forms. What a large number of people do not realize however is that ancient Greece not only condoned but also promoted homosexuality during its early reign of existence. Believing that love between samesex was inherently no different than that of love between opposite sexes.

Among the many beliefs of ancient Greek people was that homosexuality brought forward a great responsibility. Those older gentlemen who held a samesex relationship were required to assist in the education and development of their younger partners. As a means to promote a civilized and respectable person who would lend value to its people and cultrure in some way. In essence, older Greek men who took a younger samesex partner were viewed not just as their lover, but also as their mentor. And in return, the older gentlmen obtained a certain social status for his ability to properly take a younger partner and train them to become a productive member of their society. However, samesex relationships were also limited insofar as the acceptable ages of the younger partner. Thus, to have a relationship with what moder day society calls a minor was considered to be beyond the acceptable norm even for the libernalness of Greek philosophies and accepable behavior.

In many respects, religion has played a very significant role in all cultrures and eras in the world. Shaping not only the spirituality of each cultrure, but also impacting political policies and promoting specific socital moralities. To this, religion also brought forth an uprising against homosexuality in ancient Greece on the premise that it was against the word of God and thus, was to be condemed. And because of this, samesex relationships absorbed the face of silence or as modern day terminology calls it, "living in the closet".

Biblical scriptures have often been used to rationalize the hypocrical postions man frequently takes on any given subject. Thus, while it is acceptable to view homosexuals as an abomination to Gods' word. The heterosexual population is not always willing to equally see that such things as adultry, crackhead babies, and divorse; to name but a few, are also considered to be an abomination of Gods' word. Yet, what many people confuse is that while bibical scriptures do not condone the "behavior" of homosexuality. They do not "condem" the homosexual person unto themself. Though countless of heterosexuals equate one to be the same as the other and because of this. Are quick to condem the person as well as the behavior.

If one is to accept that God knows everything about a person and how their life will be lived, before s/he is ever born. We must then ask, why would God allow a person to be born when they will only succeed in having their names removed from the book of life in the end? The most common reply is that God grants every person the right of free choice and because of this, everyone has the ability to either follow God's word or to walk a different path. What the vast majorit of people do not understand is that at the core of the choice given is not necessarily whether or not to follow God's word or walk a different path. But rather, to choose between which hell a person wants to live within. Be it "hell on Earth" or hell by bibicial definitions. Because when a person must choose between being loved and giving love, and that of never knowing love at all thoughout their entire life. It becomes an unimaginable hell all its own. Moreover, because there is no guarantee that a person will actually enter into the Kingdom of Heaven. As any number of other sins can bar this from ever occurring. The "choice" given becomes an even more tramatic gamble that can transcend the living hell into the spiritual hell forever felt. In the end, giving no clear cut answers by definition of "free choice".

Chirs