KConnor56
03-04-2003, 01:25 AM
HOW COMPETENT ARE YOUNGSTERS TO STAND TRIAL AS ADULTS?
Significant proportions of children age 15 or younger charged
with a crime are not competent to stand trial, according to a new
study. The question arises from a Supreme Court ruling that
retarded people and the mentally ill must be able to understand
the charges against them and make basic decisions at trial.
Researchers and legal scholars have raised the question that if
those categories of defendants are protected, should normal
youngsters who similarly cannot comprehend the basics of law not
be similarly protected?
The study by the Research Network on Adolescent Development and
Juvenile Justice concluded that:
o One-third of children ages 11 through 13 and one-fifth of
those ages 14 or 15 understood legal matters at a level
similar to that of mentally ill adults who have been found
incompetent to stand trial.
o Older adolescents did not perform significantly different
from young adults.
o Roughly 200,000 juveniles are criminally charged as adults
every year.
o The Justice Department estimates that 12 percent of the
juveniles charged as adults in 1996 were younger than 16.
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia set no minimum
age at which children can be tried as adults -- and 27 set a
minimum age for at least some crimes at 15 or younger.
Source: Adam Liptak, "Study Doubts Competence of Many Younger
Juveniles Charged as Adults to Stand Trial," New York Times,
March 3, 2003.
For text
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/03/national/03STUD.html
Significant proportions of children age 15 or younger charged
with a crime are not competent to stand trial, according to a new
study. The question arises from a Supreme Court ruling that
retarded people and the mentally ill must be able to understand
the charges against them and make basic decisions at trial.
Researchers and legal scholars have raised the question that if
those categories of defendants are protected, should normal
youngsters who similarly cannot comprehend the basics of law not
be similarly protected?
The study by the Research Network on Adolescent Development and
Juvenile Justice concluded that:
o One-third of children ages 11 through 13 and one-fifth of
those ages 14 or 15 understood legal matters at a level
similar to that of mentally ill adults who have been found
incompetent to stand trial.
o Older adolescents did not perform significantly different
from young adults.
o Roughly 200,000 juveniles are criminally charged as adults
every year.
o The Justice Department estimates that 12 percent of the
juveniles charged as adults in 1996 were younger than 16.
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia set no minimum
age at which children can be tried as adults -- and 27 set a
minimum age for at least some crimes at 15 or younger.
Source: Adam Liptak, "Study Doubts Competence of Many Younger
Juveniles Charged as Adults to Stand Trial," New York Times,
March 3, 2003.
For text
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/03/national/03STUD.html