I guess Mugabe has his own way of making sure he stays elected.

New claims of abuses in Zim
18/01/2005 14:54 - (SA)

London - A British newspaper reported on Tuesday that it had received fresh evidence of human rights abuses in Zimbabwe by pro-government supporters ahead of parliamentary elections.

The Guardian daily said photographs taken by an activist show evidence of intimidation and violence against opposition figures. It published one of the pictures, showing a woman with burns who was reportedly doused in paraffin and set alight.

The Zimbabwean High Commission in London dismissed the claims in The Guardian story. "It's a highly opinionated article which doesn't contain any facts at all," said Godfrey Magwenzi, the deputy high commissioner.

President Robert Mugabe, who has led Zimbabwe since independence in 1980, has used police and other security forces to harass opponents and journalists and deployed state-controlled militias of youths and so-called war veterans to violently suppress any form of dissent.

Dismissed criticism

Mugabe and his government have dismissed criticism of his regime as part of a campaign by Western governments, particularly Britain and the United States, to undermine Zimbabwe, where parliamentary elections are scheduled to take place in March.

The Guardian said the photographs documented violence against supporters of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change by youth militia groups sympathetic to Mugabe's governing ZANU-PF party, the police and state agents.

The paper said one of the photos showed Tabeth Shoniwa, the chair of an MDC constituency group, a few days after she had been doused in paraffin and set on fire. The paper said Shoniwa was in hiding following the attack in October.

The Guardian said the activist who took the photos spent a year documenting abuses by pro-government supporters in Zimbabwe. It said it passed the pictures to London-based human rights group Amnesty International.

No one was immediately available at Amnesty on Tuesday morning for comment on The Guardian report.

Magwenzi, the Zimbabwean deputy high commissioner, said he wasn't surprised that Guardian reporter Andrew Meldrum had written the article.

Meldrum, one of the two authors of the story, was expelled from Zimbabwe in 2003 after the government failed in an attempt to try him for defying stringent media laws.

Zimbabwe: the terror and abuse goes on

Guardian given file of new allegations of violence against opposition in run-up to parliamentary elections

Paul Kelso and Andrew Meldrum
Tuesday January 18, 2005
The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk)

New evidence of alleged attacks on opposition supporters in Zimbabwe has been passed to the Guardian by activists who say they are being subjected to systematic violence, intimidation and sexual abuse in the run-up to elections in March. In one case, a woman who chaired a constituency group said she was covered in paraffin and set alight. She is now in hiding, but has agreed to have her photograph published to highlight the situation.

Supporters of the Movement for Democratic Change, the main opposition party, say they have been targeted by youth militia groups sympathetic to Robert Mugabe's ruling party, Zanu-PF.

Photographs given to the Guardian, MDC officials say, show evidence of intimidation and violence against local party activists, including systematic arrests and beatings of women.

The Guardian has passed the pictures to Amnesty International.

A Zimbabwe government spokesman hung up the phone when asked to comment on allegations of torture by youth militia, police and other state agents.

The government has previously denied torturing its critics.

Lawyers, doctors and Zimbabwean exiles involved in the asylum process in the UK also claim that the Home Office is ignoring prima facie cases of torture and repatriating exiles who will face further maltreatment on their return.

The evidence comes as a high level delegation of diplomats from South Africa, Botswana and Lesotho prepares to visit Zimbabwe, possibly this week.

They hope to establish whether conditions laid down by the Southern African Development Community for a free and fair election have been met.

The SADC benchmarks, set out last year in Mauritius, state that political tolerance, freedom of association and full participation of all citizens are prerequisites.

Evidence of violence and intimidation was passed to the Guardian by an activist who has spent the last year documenting instances of abuse by the police and Zanu-PF youth militia. The activist photographed Tabeth Shoniwa, the MDC chair of Ward 5, in Epworth, south-east Harare, a few days after she had been doused in paraffin and set alight.

Her crime was to have attended the high court in Harare on October 15 2004, the day the MDC leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, was acquitted of treason. Ms Shoniwa celebrated outside the court with other MDC supporters and in the evening Zanu sympathisers visited her home.

"A group of Zanu-PF youth who terrorise people followed her to her home," the activist told the Guardian. "They called her out of her home and threw paraffin on her body and set her alight. She jumped into a well to put out the flames.

"There were other people there targeted and beaten. One man I saw had his face swollen beyond recognition, and another had his eardrums damaged by the beating he received."

The MDC claims the country's draconian laws on freedom of association are being routinely used to intimidate the opposition.

Policy change


In one recent incident, 25 people, including four women, were arrested for attending the funeral of an opposition politician, the source said. The women were beaten across the back and legs, and then taken to hospital where they were under police guard, preventing the activist from documenting their injuries.

Evidence of the abuse and torture of political opponents has also surfaced in the UK, where lawyers and doctors working within the asylum system claim the British government is repatriating torture victims because of a culture of "disbelief".

In November, the Home Office announced it was overturning its policy, adopted in 2002, of not repatriating Zimbabweans whose asylum applications had failed. The earlier policy was based on compelling evidence of state torture.

According to one doctor working with asylum applicants, the Home Office has rejected detailed medical evidence of torture in refusing asylum to many Zimbabweans.

More than 10 Zimbabweans have already been returned to Harare and scores face deportation in the coming weeks.

One victim was allegedly told it had been "foolhardy" to support the MDC, and Home Office adjudicators have in some cases advised victims to return to Zimbabwe and "seek protection from the police" when in many cases police were the perpetrators of the abuse.

The doctor, who declined to be named for fear he will lose access to patients, said Zimbabweans were among the top three nationalities presenting themselves to him with injuries consistent with torture.

"I have done this for eight years and in the past four years Zimbabwe has become one of the top three or four torture-producing countries," he told the Guardian,

"In the past four years the cases of Zimbabwean torture have risen exponentially, both in terms of numbers and in severity. It appears that rape and sexual abuse has become systematic. I do not see how, in good conscience, the Home Office can send these traumatised people back to the hands of their torturers."

Margaret Finch, a Birmingham lawyer with experience of Zimbabwe, said the asylum system was ignoring evidence of torture and abuse. "The Home Office of ficials often give subjective and questionable judgments. In several cases accepted facts of physical and sexual assault by government agents were deemed to be not of a political nature. It is inconceivable.

"I would like to see a return to the policy of not repatriating Zimbabweans. Nothing has improved in Zimbabwe, things have only got worse. What justification can there possibly be for lifting the ban? Everybody is infected by a culture of disbelief."

A Home Office spokeswoman said the change in policy was prompted by an increase in unfounded asylum claims from Zimbabwe, but genuine refugees, including opposition politicians, would be protected. "This change in asylum policy is entirely about operating a firm and fair asylum system. It does not reflect any change in the government's categorical opposition to human rights abuses in Zimbabwe.

"We will continue, bilaterally and with our international partners, to push the government of Zimbabwe to end human rights abuses, and restore democracy so all Zimbabweans can in time return safely to build a prosperous and stable country."

guardian

Thankyou for the original, i could not find it, maybe didnt look hard enough. A sad but very true thing. people are intimidated when it comes to elections. They are beaten to within an inchof their lives if they oppose the Mugabe regime. If i sit and look at the horror of it all, and what Mugabe and his followers are capable of doing to their people just to stay in power, it saddens me. But if i have to be totally honest, most leaders are power hungry and dont really give a damn about the people they are supposed to protect and their problems, especially here in Africa. The human suffering that power inflicts on our people is really horrendous.